Erryk's Conscience Becomes Rhaenys's Exit
86%

Plausibility Score

(?)

Convinced

(?)

#300

of 705 theories

Theory Ranking

(?)
Ad

READER VERDICT

Is this theory convincing?

Trend builds after 10 votes.

Be among the first to weigh in.

Ad

THEORY ASSESSMENT

The ground truth confirms every component of this theory: the fighting pit visit, Erryk's stated judgment, his refusal at the Grand Sept, and his rescue of Rhaenys, making this one of the most directly supported readings in the episode.

Episode Narrative Fit(?)
91 / 100
Evidence(?)
Primarily dialogue and visual evidence

STORY CONTEXT

The Lord Commander went from Rhaenyra's sworn protector to her bitter enemy, and fans here debate what truly drives him: wounded pride, genuine belief in the Green cause, religious conviction, or something darker rooted in that rejected night.

WHY THIS MATTERS

If Erryk's defection was driven by moral self-preservation rather than political conviction, then Rhaenyra has welcomed into her Kingsguard a man whose loyalty was formed by what he was escaping, not by what he was choosing. That distinction has consequences the Black faction has not yet had to test.

Ad

Other Theories for S1E09

84%

Alicent's Ignorance Was Otto's Most Sophisticated Weapon

Otto Hightower ran an active coup apparatus for years before Viserys died, and the conspiracy's most deliberately engineered feature was Alicent's complete exclusion from it.

82%

Mysaria Uses Aegon as Political Bargaining Chip

Mysaria's demand that Otto shut down the child fighting rings was not the point of the exchange.

81%

Beesbury Names the Crime No One Will Investigate

The Green council's coup rests on a charge its members never rebut: Lyman Beesbury's argument that a king well the night before does not reverse thirty years of succession policy on his deathbed with only the new heir's mother as witness.

80%

Rhaenys's Mercy Is a Power Play That Guarantees the War

Rhaenys withholds Meleys's fire not from loyalty to Rhaenyra or scruple about kinslaying, but from a cold, premeditated act of self-assertion by a woman who has already learned what Westerosi power does to female claimants, and who has decided to manage this war rather than serve in it.

80%

Cole Kills for Alicent, Not the Crown

Criston Cole does not serve the Green faction.

80%

Aemond Is Already Positioning Against Aegon

Aemond views Aegon's coronation not as a settlement but as an opening position, and he is already constructing the internal architecture that would allow him to govern from behind or beneath a king he considers illegitimate.

70%

Mysaria Undersold Aegon to Protect Something Else

Mysaria's decision to trade Aegon for the closure of child fighting pits was not a failure to press her advantage but a deliberate refusal to enter the court's economy of power and debt.

65%

Helaena's Line Predicts the Throne's Fate

Helaena's line 'if one possesses a thing, the other will take it away' is not oblique character texture but a directional prophecy with a specific implied outcome: Rhaenyra will take the Iron Throne from Aegon, and the verb 'take' demands an agent, a deliberate act, and a victor rather than stalemate or mutual destruction.